Of course the student fee cuts, the following protests and provoked violence should be seen for what it is - completely engineered, because when hundreds of thousands protested against going to war....they were ignored anyway
So always ask yourself the question - Who really benefits from these situations.
the students? / the average tax payer? / the governement? / the bankers?
obviously the governement will continue to do everything it can to put and keep as many people in debt and slaving away for their entire lives, so they need to install the debt in people as early as possible
In the grand scheme of the country's debt (which is ficticious anyway and doesn't need to be there) and the cuts needed and the blah blah blah, someone at the Telegraph had this to say:
Student fee 'savings' will fund windmills in Africa
The £2.9 billion the Government will save by increasing tuition fees matches the amount earmarked for a global warming project, finds Christopher Booker.

The cause of the major political story of last week – the row over tuition fees, students rioting and all – was, as we all know, “public spending cuts”. But how much money does the Government actually hope to save on tuition fees? If the immediate problem is our massive state deficit, it seems odd that the Government should risk such unpopularity, not for any immediate saving, but in the hope that it will get the money back over the next 30 years, as students can afford to repay it.
In the short term, the Government’s own projection as to how much it will save is that the funding of university tuition will be cut by £2.9 billion by 2014. As it happens, £2.9 billion is the sum ring-fenced, by the same public spending review, to be given to developing countries to help them fight global warming with windmills and solar panels. It is also slightly less than the £3 billion by which our public debt is rising every week. These much-vaunted “cuts” are not all we are led to believe.
--------
The interest charge on UK governement debt for 2010 is estimated to be £25 - £30 billion (some say £43b). (the Times and the Telegraph )
No comments:
Post a Comment